COUPONS FOR PUREX
Right now you can snag a sweet deal on Purex Laundry Detergent 75 oz. for ONLY $1.20 at Dollar General. They are on sale for $2.95 and we have two coupons that you can stack making each bottle ONLY $1.20. That is a MAJOR STOCK UP price!! You will want to hurry and snag the coupons before they reach their limit and stock up on laundry detergent. Please also consider donating a bottle to your local laundromat!!
Here’s what the deal looks like:
**DOLLAR GENERAL SCENARIO THRU 3/15**
Buy (2) Purex Liquid Laundry Detergent 75 oz.-$2.95
Total: $5.90
Use (2) $1.00/1 Purex Liquid Laundry Detergent 75 oz Dollar General Printable Coupon (Use Zip Code 21666)
PLUS Use (1) $1.50/2 Purex Laundry Detergents Printable Coupon
Final Cost: $2.40 for both or JUST $1.20 each wyb 2!!
**REMEMBER YOU CAN PRINT 2 COUPONS PER COMPUTER**
To see the Dollar General Coupon Policy CLICK HERE
Never miss a deal subscribe to our daily newsletters by CLICKING HERE Also, don’t forget to follow us on Pinterest and Twitter!!
Or Purchase my Book Extreme Couponing and Learn How to Coupon and cut your bill by at least half by CLICKING HERE!!
Thanks, MojoSavings
This post may contain affiliate links. Read my complete Disclosure Policy Here
J.C. says
I decided to make a trip for this deal but Dollar General would only take 1 Dollar General Coupon and 1 Manufacturer coupon. They wouldn’t accept the second Dollar General.
Joni says
That’s why it is so important to always take the coupon policy with you, because many clerks don’t even know their own policies. . they accept one store and one manufacturer per product:)
Joanie says
Same thing happened to me yesterday. The manager argued with me stating that on the Manufacturer coupon it states that, “coupon not valid with other coupons.” I asked him for a coupon policy and he stated he didn’t have one.
Joni says
That is true. . my coupon did not say that, but I had printed them the first time. . if it says not valid with other coupons, then you cannot combine them. . hope that helps:) Initial print did not state that:)